David Fetter wrote: > On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 11:41:11PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > > > OK. At this stage it should all just wait for 8.2. > > > > > > Haven't we already committed some feature changes in this area? I > > > dislike the idea of shipping a transient state just because "we > > > ran out of time". Once we ship 8.1, that will be another behavior > > > that we have to consider backwards compatibility with. We should > > > either fix it right, or revert to the 8.0 behavior for this > > > release. > > > > I documented in TODO what doesn't log properly in 8.1. I don't see > > how logging output has to be backward compatible. > > Dunno about this particular case, but not having backward-compatible > logging output has already broken pqa. Proposal on logging to > -hackers follows...
Yes, that is one area that is of concern for logging changes. What I have done is to get minimal logging of the FETCH behavior into 8.1, along with what we already have added in 8.1. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
