David Fetter wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 11:41:11PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > > OK.  At this stage it should all just wait for 8.2.
> > > 
> > > Haven't we already committed some feature changes in this area?  I
> > > dislike the idea of shipping a transient state just because "we
> > > ran out of time".  Once we ship 8.1, that will be another behavior
> > > that we have to consider backwards compatibility with.  We should
> > > either fix it right, or revert to the 8.0 behavior for this
> > > release.
> > 
> > I documented in TODO what doesn't log properly in 8.1.  I don't see
> > how logging output has to be backward compatible.
> 
> Dunno about this particular case, but not having backward-compatible
> logging output has already broken pqa.  Proposal on logging to
> -hackers follows...

Yes, that is one area that is of concern for logging changes.  What I
have done is to get minimal logging of the FETCH behavior into 8.1,
along with what we already have added in 8.1.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Reply via email to