I'm confused by this part of the patch, circa line 1835 of pl_exec.c:
/* coerce type if needed */
if (estate->rsi && IsA(estate->rsi, ReturnSetInfo) &&
estate->rsi->expectedDesc != NULL &&
!compatible_tupdesc(estate->rsi->expectedDesc, in_tupdesc))
{
estate->retval = (Datum) make_tuple_from_tuple(estate,
&td,
in_tupdesc,
estate->rsi->expectedDesc);
if (estate->retval == PointerGetDatum(NULL))
ereport(...);
Advertising
estate->rettupdesc = estate->rsi->expectedDesc;
}
else
{
estate->retval = (Datum) heap_copytuple(&td);
estate->rettupdesc = in_tupdesc;
}
This is for the "tuple returning function" case of RETURN. estate->rsi
seems to contain information for set-returning functions -- why do we
need to use it to obtain the expected tupledesc of the function's return
value? I'm just wondering if we ought to be fetching this from somewhere
else.
As it stands, this seems plainly wrong:
create type __trt as (x integer, y integer, z text);
create or replace function return_row4() returns __trt as $$
begin
return (1,2,'3'::text,4);
end;
$$ language plpgsql;
select return_row4();
return_row4
-------------
(1,2,3,4)
(1 row)
-Neil
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
