> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Joshua D. Drake > Sent: 17 November 2005 15:58 > To: Andreas Pflug > Cc: Tom Lane; Simon Riggs; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Numeric 508 datatype > > > > > > Hm, so if this patch is applied now, and in 5 months or so somebody > > implements pg_upgrade, this numeric storage patch would be > rolled back? > > OTOH, an upgrade mechanism that's compatible for future > 8.3+ versions > > only seems not too attractive. > With Slony and Replicator I don't really see the need for in place > upgrades.
They're not exactly easy to setup for the casual user (well, I assume replicator isn't but it's not relevant to the majority of our users anyway). Regards, Dave. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match