Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now I noticed that there are multiple functions pg_class_aclmask,
> pg_database_aclmask, pg_language_aclmask, etc. Is there any objection
> to making the exported routine expose the object type as an AclKind
> parameter instead of having one function for each object type?
How about "in addition to" instead of "instead"? I see no reason to
impose extra notation and a level of indirection on the places that know
perfectly well which object type they are dealing with.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
