Tom Lane wrote: > I believe Peter's question was rhetorical: what he meant to point out > is that the documentation needs to explain what is the reason for > having this switch, ie, in what cases would you use it or not use it? > Just saying what it does isn't really adequate docs.
I once considered implementing this myself but found it infeasible for some reason I don't remember. Nevertheless I always thought that having an atomic restore ought to be a non-optional feature. Are there situations where one would not want to use it? (And if so, which one is the more normal case?) -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
