Qingqing Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 24 Dec 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Removing these comments entirely, without changing the code they explain,
>> doesn't strike me as an improvement.
> I just checked if we can remove XLOG_NO_TRAN happily, and the conclusion
> is that it could bring some benefits (though not much) to our system. The
> key is the CheckpointStartLock lock.
Hm. Perhaps we could keep the current behavior and re-document
XLOG_NO_TRAN as meaning that the xlog record does not involve the
insertion of our XID into permanent storage.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
