Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The tests above seem fairly ad-hoc.
No kidding. But what do you think the correct test is? The comment's claim that stuff named "<unnamed cursor>" should be suppressed seems wrong to begin with, as those are perfectly good cursors. I'm also unconvinced that a test on portal->status is a good idea, as I doubt that ACTIVE should be excluded, and I'm not sure that DONE or FAILED should be either, and NEW is probably a non-issue because you'll never see it from within a running command. What is the point of having this code discriminate against any portals whatever? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org