On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 11:48:54AM -0800, David Fetter wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 07:08:28PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > David Fetter wrote: > > > It's paper bag time for me. How about a new patch which gives > > > each contrib project its own directory and places them there? > > > > This would presumably imply that the installation scripts would be > > renamed to install.sql. On a green field this might make sense but > > as it is maybe it would break too much without much benefit? > > You're right. I'll send a patch this evening my time that renames > each to [module_name]_uninstall.sql.
Advertising
ISTM there's a pretty good usecase for going per-directory down the road. IIRC we already decided to do that for doc directories, and now that we'd have 2 scripts (_install and _uninstall) it seems a good idea for that as well. For backwards compatability maybe an install option that also installed the old-style _install.sql script would be adequate? Perhaps this could default to on for 8.2, off for 8.3 and gone for 8.4... -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
