Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Attached is a revised patch: all the regression tests patch, and I'm not
> aware of any major remaining issues. Barring any objections, I'll apply
> this tomorrow.

I object ... this is still trying to enforce tupdesc refcounting on much
more of the system than I think useful or prudent.

I'll try to come up with an alternative patch.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to