* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I believe the attached patch does this now. Under my test case it > > correctly handled things. I'm certainly happier with it this way and > > apologize for not realizing this better approach sooner. Please > > comment. > > Applied (with trivial stylistic changes) as far back as 8.0, which > was the first release that would try to continue after an error.
Great, thanks! Now if I can convince you to look at the Kerberos patch I posted on -hackers... ;) Thanks again, Stephen
Description: Digital signature