Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe this is safe.

I won't insult your intelligence by pointing out how I know that you
didn't even test the patch against hash or gist.

The major problem with the patch is that it's incapable of producing
correct tuple-count stats for partial indexes, which is really not
acceptable from a planning standpoint.  What I'm currently fooling with
is skipping the bulkdelete scan only if the index isn't partial...

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not

Reply via email to