Tom Lane wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) writes: > > Log Message: > > ----------- > > Allow ALTER TABLE ... ALTER CONSTRAINT ... RENAME > > This patch appears seriously broken, in particular every routine I > looked at contained incorrect locking assumptions. Nor do I care > for using pg_depend for the purposes it's being used for here.
OK, how do we proceed? Revert or apply a second patch? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
