Tom Lane wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> > Log Message:
> > -----------
> > Allow ALTER TABLE ... ALTER CONSTRAINT ... RENAME
> 
> This patch appears seriously broken, in particular every routine I
> looked at contained incorrect locking assumptions.  Nor do I care
> for using pg_depend for the purposes it's being used for here.

OK, how do we proceed?  Revert or apply a second patch?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

               http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to