"Neil Conway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> Attached is a patch that implements <> for the tid type. This is based
> on a patch submitted by Mark Kirkwood in October of 2005. I added some
> regression tests, avoided unnecessarily renumbering a few OIDs in the
> system catalogs, and bumped the catversion.
>
Does it make sense to implementation > or < for the tid type? I will see it
as a "kinda" alternative for LIMIT clause.
Regards,
Qingqing
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
