Tom Lane wrote: > "Kevin Grittner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> "statement" isn't a great name for the units > >>> that we are actually processing. We're really wanting to do these > >>> things once per client command, or maybe per client query would be > >>> a better name. > >> > >> Right. > > > What about "query string"? If you want to include the term "client", I > > would find "client query string" less confusing than "client command" or > > "client query". > > "Query string" is a term we've used in the past, and it shows up in the > source code. I could live with that, but I'm not sure if it's got any > good connotations for people who haven't got their hands dirty in the > code ...
Peter hammered us quite a bit in the past that we send "statements", not just queries (aka SELECT). It is hard to argue with that. -- Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
