pgman wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <> writes:
> > > The attached patch checks for the file, and either user it or generates
> > > a log message that it was skipped.
> > 
> > I still can't get excited about this.  Who will it help?  The DBA who is
> > silly enough to think his ancient SSL library supports CRL is probably
> > also silly enough not to read the postmaster log carefully.  It would
> > make a whole lot more sense just to document that OpenSSL < whatever
> > doesn't support CRL.
> Why hard-code something if we can dynamically report it, and NetBSD 2.0
> isn't that old.

Sorry, I meant NetBSD 1.6/canary:

Anyway, if we are doing CRL, we should do it right.

  Bruce Momjian

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to