Magnus Hagander wrote: > > >>> This was not ready to be applied, was it? > > > > > I don't recall any specific objections that weren't answered. > > > > How about the fact that it's already caused one buildfarm failure? > > > > http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=wasp&dt=2006 > -04-30%2003:05:01 > > > Well, that objection certainly wasn't raised before since it wasn't on > buildfarm, and it passed the regression tests many times on my systems. > > Oh, and apparantly it caused the same issue on firefly. I don't really > see the connection between these two platforms and why it should happen > just there, though. Any ideas on that part?
Was this fixed somehow? I don't see any more buildfarm failures, but I didn't see a fix go in either. It is very possible the pgport fix I did yesterday is related, but I have not applied it yet. -- Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
