Qingqing Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In spirit of incremental improvement, here is a trivial fix to use %p
> instead %d to print pointer. -- maybe we should use context name better.

Actually, I wonder whether we shouldn't just get rid of these things
(CTX_printf/CTX1_printf) entirely; they seem fairly useless, especially
since most node types don't have 'em.  Certainly if anyone had actually
*used* them in the past several years, there would have been some effort
to convert them to elog's instead of raw printf operations.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to