Qingqing Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In spirit of incremental improvement, here is a trivial fix to use %p > instead %d to print pointer. -- maybe we should use context name better.
Actually, I wonder whether we shouldn't just get rid of these things (CTX_printf/CTX1_printf) entirely; they seem fairly useless, especially since most node types don't have 'em. Certainly if anyone had actually *used* them in the past several years, there would have been some effort to convert them to elog's instead of raw printf operations. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org