Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Here's a patch for tg_table_name and tg_table_schema for plpgsql, which I would appreciate a quick review of just to make sure I haven't missed something or done something silly.

Looks all right other than odd indentation ;-)

Did you mean in pl_exec.c? It looks better when applied - but it's not easy to fit that long call into 80 cols neatly. I guess if pg_indent doesn't like it it will tidy thing up when we do a run.

If you want to test tg_relid, what about casting it to regclass to get a
reasonable symbolic printout?

Good idea - I'll do that for plpgsql where it's easier. I don't think it's worth the trouble for the other PLs.



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to