ITAGAKI Takahiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Jonah H. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There's 4 shift/reduce conflicts which I believe are caused by having
>> used WITH... did you plan to fix this?
> Thanks for pointing out. I realized it is a confliction between
> WITH OIDS and WITH (options).
> I'll try to treat CreateStmt.hasoids as one of the options internally,
> with SQL-level backward compatibility.
There was some discussion recently about how we'll have to make WITH
a fully reserved keyword eventually anyway to handle SQL99 recursive
queries. I'm not sure if that's really true, but reserving WITH is
a fallback position we should consider, if avoiding the shift/reduce
conflict seems unreasonably messy otherwise.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
