Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > We should try very hard to avoid adding new reserved words, IMNSHO.
>
> *Especially* ones not sanctioned by the SQL spec. Reserving a word that
> is not listed as reserved in the standard is really a spec violation,
> because it means that spec-conforming SQL commands may fail.
Advertising
I expected that but I haven't seen any agreement on a replacement syntax. The
only other one proposed was:
ALTER TABLE foo ALTER INHERITS ADD|DROP bar
and it received no comments. Should I just assume that's the direction to go
if nobody objects?
--
greg
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
