Hans-Juergen Schoenig wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>I don't see why views should be special. Tables clearly should be > >>because we can open them directly. > >> > >> > > > >Ah, I didn't think of that. Good idea. So we don't need this patch? > > > > > > > > why do we agree on a patch, implement it and reject it then? > would be easier to reject it before actually implementing it ... > it is quite hard to explain to a customer that something is rejected > after approval - even if things are written properly ...
Agreed. The problem with this patch is that originally we just wanted views, and later the idea of putting a query in there was agreed on, so the feature request has changed over time. -- Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
