Patch applied.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > If you put a contition test in set_ps_display(), the only clean way to
> > > do this is for init_ps_display() to force update_process_title to true
> > > before we call set_ps_display(), then reset it to its original value,
> > > but that sounds pretty ugly.
> > 
> > No, refactor the code.  I was envisioning something called maybe
> > transmit_ps_display that would contain the part of set_ps_display
> > beginning at "Transmit new setting to kernel".  Then both set_ps_display
> > and init_ps_display would call that.
> 
> I went with a 'force' boolean for set_ps_display().
> 
> -- 
>   Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com
> 
>   + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to