'k, isn't the Reply-To header part of an RFC somewhere? Or is it really an optional thing for an MUA to follow?

On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

On Tuesday 11 July 2006 18:20, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
checking ot make sure it works and gives the right answer ...

Kmail ignores it


----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED]                              MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

--
  === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
  Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
            http://www.commandprompt.com/




----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED]                              MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
      choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
      match

Reply via email to