'k, isn't the Reply-To header part of an RFC somewhere? Or is it really
an optional thing for an MUA to follow?
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 18:20, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
checking ot make sure it works and gives the right answer ...
Kmail ignores it
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
