Darcy Buskermolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The question though is if we did that, would Slony actually use it?

> If it made sence to do it, then yes we would do it. The problem ends up being
> Slony is designed to work across a multitude of versions of PG, and unless 
> this was backported to at least 7.4, it would take a while (ie when we 
> stopped supporting versions older than it was ported into)  before we would 
> make use of it.

[ shrug... ]  That's not happening; for one thing the change requires a
layout change in pg_control and we have no mechanism to do that without

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to