Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Alvaro has just applied a modified version of this patch.
Advertising
Hannu, I'm curious: > Hannu Krosing wrote: > > Ok, this is a new version of the vacuum patch with the following changes > > following some suggestions in this thread. > > > > * changed the patch to affect only lazy vacuum > > * moved inVacuum handling to use PG_TRY > > * moved vac_update_relstats() out of lazy_vacuum_rel into a separate > > transaction. The code to do this may not be the prettiest, maybe it > > should use a separate struct. What was idea behind moving vac_update_relstats to a separate transaction? I'm wondering if it's still needed, if it further enhances the system somehow, or your patch did something differently than what was applied. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
