Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Updated patch. Fixed a few minor things, added documentation and > > > regression > > > tests. Unfortunately I can't test the regression tests because I get a > > > segmentation fault earlier in the same file due to a GIN index build. So I > > > haven't updated the "expected" output. > > > > What's the status of this patch --- have you done anything more with it > > since the 13-Jul submission? > > I haven't done anything. I was mostly waiting until I got some feedback about > the code quality. I figured if there were parts that had to be reworked or > fixed up I would prefer to do that first before worrying about perfecting > details which is all that I believe remain.
Just remembered one open question I had. I'm not clear what to do with the index statistics. It may be that the current code is basically the right thing -- it leaves the statistics as they are after phase 1, ie after the regular index build before we go through looking for newly added tuples. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
