Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Updated patch. Fixed a few minor things, added documentation and 
> > > regression
> > > tests. Unfortunately I can't test the regression tests because I get a
> > > segmentation fault earlier in the same file due to a GIN index build. So I
> > > haven't updated the "expected" output.
> > 
> > What's the status of this patch --- have you done anything more with it
> > since the 13-Jul submission?
> I haven't done anything. I was mostly waiting until I got some feedback about
> the code quality. I figured if there were parts that had to be reworked or
> fixed up I would prefer to do that first before worrying about perfecting
> details which is all that I believe remain.

Just remembered one open question I had. I'm not clear what to do with the
index statistics. It may be that the current code is basically the right thing
-- it leaves the statistics as they are after phase 1, ie after the regular
index build before we go through looking for newly added tuples.

  Gregory Stark

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to