Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > OK, got it.  I just don't see the value to doing \g and not ;. I think
> > the \gc case was a hack when he didn't have \set.  Now that we have
> > \set, we should be consistent.
> I'm willing to accept this if we can make sure we aren't adding any
> overhead --- see my proposal elsewhere in the thread for fixing that.

Right, if \g has overhead, I don't want people to start using ; because
it is faster.  That is the kind of behavior that makes us look sloppy.

  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to