BTom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yes, I do.  I have applied the attached patch to fix this issue and
> > several others.  The fix was to save the bind parameters in the portal,
> > and display those in the executor output, if available.
> I have a feeling you just blew away the 4% savings in psql I've spent
> the evening on.  What's the overhead of this patch?

The only overhead I see is calling log_after_parse() all the time,
rather than only when log_statement is all.  I could fix it by checking
log_statement and log_min_duration_statement >= 0.  Does
log_after_parse() look heavy to you?

  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to