Guillaume Lelarge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> diff -r1.89 print.c
> 853c853
> <                                     snprintf(record_str, 64, "* Record 
> %lu", record++);
> ---
>> snprintf(record_str, 64, _("* Record %lu"), record++);
> 855c855
> <                                     snprintf(record_str, 64, "[ RECORD %lu 
> ]", record++);
> ---
>> snprintf(record_str, 64, _("[ RECORD %lu ]"), record++);

Hm, these strings were never localizable in previous versions; if we
make them so, do we risk breaking any code that examines psql output?

What about the equivalent headers in the other output formats?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

               http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to