Guillaume Lelarge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > diff -r1.89 print.c > 853c853 > < snprintf(record_str, 64, "* Record > %lu", record++); > --- >> snprintf(record_str, 64, _("* Record %lu"), record++); > 855c855 > < snprintf(record_str, 64, "[ RECORD %lu > ]", record++); > --- >> snprintf(record_str, 64, _("[ RECORD %lu ]"), record++);
Hm, these strings were never localizable in previous versions; if we make them so, do we risk breaking any code that examines psql output? What about the equivalent headers in the other output formats? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org