On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 18:19 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> If we document it, we have to keep it current, even if
> we improve it later.  

Sounds like all the rest of the docs then...

We really need a guide to deciphering the logs, so that people can
understand how to tune things.

> I will say I had trouble testing this logging
> because it requires a C program to use that protocol.  Here is the test
> program I used.

Thanks, I'll look into this.

  Simon Riggs             
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to