On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 18:19 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > If we document it, we have to keep it current, even if > we improve it later.
Sounds like all the rest of the docs then... We really need a guide to deciphering the logs, so that people can understand how to tune things. > I will say I had trouble testing this logging > because it requires a C program to use that protocol. Here is the test > program I used. Thanks, I'll look into this. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
