Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have applied your test_fsync patch for 8.2.  Thanks.
> ... which means test_fsync is now broken.  Why did you apply a patch
> when the author pointed out that the program isn't working?

I thought his code was OK, but the OS had issues.  Clearly we need to
update test_fsync.c because it doesn't match the code.  I have reverted
the patch but some day we need a fixed version.

  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to