Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I have applied your test_fsync patch for 8.2. Thanks. > > ... which means test_fsync is now broken. Why did you apply a patch > when the author pointed out that the program isn't working?
I thought his code was OK, but the OS had issues. Clearly we need to update test_fsync.c because it doesn't match the code. I have reverted the patch but some day we need a fixed version. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
