On Fri, 2006-12-22 at 16:48 -0500, Gregory Stark wrote:
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Attached is the current state of my work on generalizing operator classes
> > into "operator families", as per discussion last week.  It's far from
> > ready to apply, but I thought I'd circulate it for comments.  What's done
> > is ...
> > Comments?
> Didn't we say discussion should happen on -hackers so development progress
> would be more visible?

I thought it did? Tom's marked this clearly as WIP.

  Simon Riggs             
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to