Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> This is *not* going in the right direction :-(

> Well, then show me what direction you think is better.

Fewer restrictions, not more.  The thrust of what I've been saying
(and I think Roman too) is to trust in the hardware float-arithmetic
implementation to be right.  Every time you add an additional "error
check" you are going in the wrong direction.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to