Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Revised patch attached, doing just this. I will apply it soon unless there are objections.

Probably a good idea to check defined(HAVE_GETRLIMIT) && defined(RLIMIT_CORE),
rather than naively assuming every getrlimit implementation supports
that particular setting.  Also, should the -c option exist but just not
do anything if the platform doesn't support it?  As is, you're making it
impossible to just specify -c without worrying if it does anything.

The documentation fails to list the long form of the switch
(--corefiles, which should probably really be --core-files for consistency).
There's a typo in this message, too:

+ _("%s: cannot set core size,: disallowed by hard limit.\n"),
        

OK, I'll fix all this. Thanks.

cheers

andrew


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at

               http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

Reply via email to