> Here is an updated updated XML patch. Unless there are objections of
> the sort that this approach is totally wrong or there is crash
> potential, I'd like to get this committed this week and fill in the
> gaps next year.
Peter - I have a few quick questions about the XML patch that you
submitted back in December.
Nikolay's original patch included support for XMLGEN(), but your patch
Are you planning to add XMLGEN() support? And if so, will it work
basically the same (from the user's perspective) as the XMLGEN() syntax
in Nikolay's patch?
Is there a problem lurking in XMLGEN() or is just something that you
haven't had a chance to complete?
Korry Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED]