Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Patch applied.  Thanks.
> I added a comment about the unused bits in the header file.

Has anyone bothered to measure the overhead added by having to mask to
fetch or store the natts value?  This is not a zero-cost improvement.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to