"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Pretty much not happening; or are you volunteering to fix every part of
>>> the system to tolerate injections of inserted data anywhere in a stored
>>> datum?
>> I was thinking to do it at a low level as the xlog records are prepared to be
>> written to the filesystem and as the data is being read from disk. I haven't
>> read that code yet to see where to inject it but I understand there's already
>> a copy happening and it could be done there.
> You understand wrong ... a tuple sitting on disk is normally read
> directly from the shared buffer, and I don't think we want to pay for
> copying it.

"xlog records"

  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to