Guillaume Smet wrote:
> On 1/12/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Usually people don't want th query unless they ask for it.  One nify
> > trick would be to print the query as DETAIL unless they are already
> > logging queries, but that just seems too complex.  If you want the
> > query, why not just log them all?
> 
> Because they can't? On a highly loaded production server, people
> usually don't log all the queries.
> 
> Anyway, if it's too complicated to implement it, perhaps it's not
> worth it. I'm just curious to see how people will use this information
> if they don't know why the temp file was created.

We have to balance functionality and ease of use.  That is the way I
analyze these issue.  We usually wait for a few people to request
additional functionality of this type, and then figure out the cleanest
way to implement it.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

               http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to