On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 12:26 -0500, Neil Conway wrote:
> Barring any objections, I'll apply a slightly improved version of this
> patch tomorrow. 

BTW, how do people feel about the function names:


The first seems fairly verbose to me, although I'm not sure I have a
better suggestion. Also, it seems unfortunate to clutter the API with
redundant versions of three functions that already exist, although I
suppose we can't afford to break backward compatibility.

Suggestions welcome.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to