On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 13:41 -0500, Neil Conway wrote: > BTW, it seems that while Oracle provides an IS NAN construct, they also > treat NaN as equal to itself (which makes me question why they added IS > NAN in the first place). So perhaps it is sufficient to leave things as > they are...
Patch applied, without the NaN TODO item. -Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly