Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >> Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> BTW, I don't care much for the terminology "phantom cid" ... there's
> >>> nothing particularly "phantom" about them, seeing they get onto disk.
> >>> Can anyone think of a better name?  The best I can do offhand is
> >>> "merged cid" or "cid pair", which aren't inspiring. 
> >> 
> >> MultiCid, like the MultiXacts? Maybe not, they're quite different beasts...
> > Dual cid?  Double cid?
> "Double cid" doesn't sound too bad.  Another thought that just came to
> mind is "cid interval" or some variant of that.

I don't like "double ctid" because it is really just one ctid, but
represents two.  I am thinking "packed ctid" is the right wording.  It
doesn't have the same impact as "phantom", but it is probably better.

  Bruce Momjian  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at


Reply via email to