Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> If we just didn't add the serial number at the end, then it would be >> impossible to create a shared memory segment for the same port again. >> That protects the port and not the datadir. But what if we change the >> name of the shared memory segment to be that of the data directory >> instead of the port? > > That would help if there's only one possible spelling of the data > directory path ... otherwise not so much ...
Well, we could run GetFullPathName() on it (http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa364963.aspx). I think that should work - takes out the "relative vs absolute path" part at least. It won't take care of somebody having a junction pointing at the data directory and starting it against that one, but that's really someone *trying* to break the system. You wouldn't do that by mistake... Seems worthwhile to you? If so I can take a look at doing it when I get some spare time. //Magnus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
