Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think we discussed replacing the current sequence representation with > > a single relation that would contain all sequences in the database, so > > that you could do "select * from pg_sequence" and get all the values in > > one go. The idea was considered not implementable at the time due to us > > not having "non transactional relations", but I'd suggest adding it to > > the TODO so that we don't forget later. > > I wonder if we could kluge it by making all sequences inheritance > children of a dummy "pg_sequence" relation. Or perhaps better, > implement this as a system view on a set-returning function --- if there > are lots of sequences the planner's not likely to help you much anyway.
I like the system view best. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
