Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ultimately, the result was that glibc was wrong in its locale settings,
> and there was a suggestion to use defaults only when using the C locale.
> However, I am worried there are too many locales in the field that only
> define some of the locale setting, so doing defaults only for the C
> locale might not work.

> The minimal patch I wrote (attached), suppresses the default for the
> thousands separator only if is is the same as the decimal separator.  I
> think this is the only area where the default could potentially match
> the locale setting for another field.

Should we really go introducing strange misbehaviors into our code to
work around an admitted glibc bug?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to