Neil Conway wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 23:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> No, it isn't.  This is *not* a candidate for back-porting.
> Why is that? It seems to me that the potential downside is essentially
> zero. This is a developer-oriented benchmark tool, after all.

To me, it is a clear line. Once we accept for one, we may accept for


Joshua D. Drake

> -Neil
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>        subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
>        message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project:
PostgreSQL Replication:

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to