Neil Conway wrote: > On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 23:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> No, it isn't. This is *not* a candidate for back-porting. > > Why is that? It seems to me that the potential downside is essentially > zero. This is a developer-oriented benchmark tool, after all.
To me, it is a clear line. Once we accept for one, we may accept for another. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > -Neil > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend