Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jeremy Drake wrote: >> # My experience with the array code leads me to believe that building >> up an array is an expensive proposition. I know I could code it >> smarter so that the array is only constructed in the end.
> You can make any code arbitrarily fast if it doesn't have to give the > right answer. Even more to the point, it's folly to suppose that the overhead of processing a SETOF result is less than that of array construction. I tend to agree with Peter's concern that returning a set is going to make it hard to track which result is which. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly