On 2/17/07, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the clarification.  Would you have a look at the tests as
they are now and confirm that that's what you wanted?

Yes, the tests in HEAD right now are what I wanted.  Although, while I
was in there I did notice a minor thing (another copy-paste error):
the timestamptz test is using a column alias that's not consistent
with other tests in the vicinity.  Patch attached.

Attachment: iso_regress_fix.patch
Description: Binary data

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to