"Hiroshi Saito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is this message necessary for setting errno again?

AFAIR we only intended that message as a temporary measure until we'd
figured out why things seemed to be failing on Windows.  If there's no
longer a need, I'd vote for removing the whole code chunk, not just
stepping the level down by one.  But if you are still seeing it, maybe
we haven't figured out why the failure?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to