"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm slightly worried though since that seems to have changed from 8.2,
> which I oprofiled over Christmas.

If you were testing a case with wider rows than Heikki tested, you'd see
less impact --- the cost of the old way was O(N^2) in the number of
tuples that fit on a page, so the behavior gets rapidly worse as you get
down to smaller tuple sizes.  (Come to think of it, the cmin/cmax
collapse would be a factor here too.)

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to