Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Maybe we should keep this issue open until we resolve the vacuum WAL
flush issue? I can then rerun the same tests to see if this patch is a
win after that.
Sounds like a plan, if you are willing to do that.
Sure, just rerunning the same tests isn't much work.
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Would you like to add a TODO item?
I don't know how we track things like this. Maybe add to the end of the
patch queue, with link to this discussion so that we remember that it
needs more testing?
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
