Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Maybe we should keep this issue open until we resolve the vacuum WAL flush issue? I can then rerun the same tests to see if this patch is a win after that.


Sounds like a plan, if you are willing to do that.

Sure, just rerunning the same tests isn't much work.

Bruce Momjian wrote:
 Would you like to add a TODO item?

I don't know how we track things like this. Maybe add to the end of the patch queue, with link to this discussion so that we remember that it needs more testing?

--
  Heikki Linnakangas
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
      choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
      match

Reply via email to